TAB 20

SOLID STATE (ASTRO) PHYSICS

If you take the "system wave" and rotate it and resize it, you can form a set of repeating patterns that fit very nicely the Schrodinger Electron Cloud Plot solutions of quantum mechanics. This solution is actually more than that, because it shows the Cloud Plots to be several nested sequences of a Fractal Theory - i.e. similar patterns repeating at subsequent levels of magnitude.

This becomes more than a curiosity when you do a simple analysis of all the comet's paths as they move in the vicinity of Jupiter (the so-called "Jupiter's family" of over thirty small comets). Assuming that the orbit of Jupiter was at the edge of one of the Cloud Plots, which can be generated using the "system curve" as 2d sections of the 3D plots (e.g. spheres, barbells, and torus shapes), if you were to extend them slightly above and below this 2D section and sprinkle the outer shell with powder, you would get exactly the silhouettes of the comets paths versus Jupiter.

The comets, through their trajectories, have traced the patterns of 3D forms that, at Jupiter's orbit, are barbell shaped. Thus, the "galactic atom" theory goes from being an interesting curiosity like Bode's Law, to being a possibility; if not a probability.

The logical progression of these hypotheses is that the pattern of electrons orbiting an atom is repeated at successive levels, up to the level of being represented on the scale of our solar system. There should, by Fractal Theory, be some intermediate level(s). It is possible to show the existence of a carrier wave to the "system wave," a small sinusoidal pattern superimposed on the much larger system wave. This small pattern has a direct correlation in the only aspect of the planets' motion not yet fit in the theory: the rate of rotation.

All of this is mostly just a geometric curiosity shown to fit a complex system. It's historically correct, conceptually reasonable, and mathematically correct, but there is no fundamental basis. In light of the other papers here, it is possible to propose that the system wave is gravitational, and the smaller carrier wave is electromagnetic in nature. ( 29 ) They may have the same frequency, having a common origin in the sun; which would make the larger one travel much, much faster - as we know gravity does. It's also reasonable that the smaller wave is electromagnetic, having its subtle effect on the rotation of planets because of the magnetic core of the bodies; i.e. acting like a magneto to induce rotation as implied in the paper proposing a cause for the so called seasonal variation of the Earth's rate of rotation. ( 29 )

The interesting part is that the carrier wave is not of constant magnitude; it has a slowly increasing magnitude. This implies that light waves do not travel unchanged through space, especially since space in the vicinity of a solar system; but is quite noticeably altered by it. This, in turn, implies that the distances we compute to nearby stars are not as far away as calculated.

Consider the EM carrier wave (i.e. the variations from the symmetric plane in (2) ) which has as its x-axis the gravity or system wave. The distance traveled by the carrier wave is greater than the shortest linear distance between two points because it's traveling along a 3D helix and the physical distance is the straight line down the center of this helix.

It's like accepting at face value that electrons travel at the speed of light through a conducting metal ( 21 ), whereas electrons do not actually go directly from one point to the next but have a sometimes widely circuitous route, going around molecules, anomalies, and so forth - so that an individual electron on average travels at the speed of light c, but may travel quite a lot faster following a Gaussian type distribution.

Assume that the EM waves have a preference to use gravity waves as their axis of propagation (refer to the analogy for the Szebehely graph to the 3BP). This means that gravity waves can be silhouetted by EM waves (like the Northern Lights and the Earth's magnetic field) using a giant oscilloscope the size of a football field (because gravity waves are so large, any lesser distance and the gravity wave would just look like a straight line).

Say you have a 250 foot long shaft of a large power planet, driving a turbine. If a gravity wave on that order of magnitude exists, then it could theoretically be detected, and perhaps lessened in intensity by virtue of the EM carrier wave (which is presumably easier to emulate). If the energy to create and sustain this carrier wave is less than the energy saved by the power plant by operating in a less intense gravity field, then it is a viable engineering application. (It is possible that gravity may be simulated using the mass analogy to charged particles (19). )

On a larger scale, say you set up this giant gravity wave oscilloscope (perhaps all you need is a huge sheet of mylar in a low Earth orbit) at Cape Kennedy, and isolate a gravity wave existing at the shuttle launch site. Configuring the shuttle flight path to follow this lazy spiral away from Earth's surface might save fuel. If the shuttle could mimic the EM carrier wave this might save even more fuel, the shuttle thereby following the gravity wave into orbit like a mono rail train. Eventually the system might be engineered to avoid the force of gravity all together, or at least a larger percentage thereof.

In deep space beyond SOI, presumably gravity waves intertwine in increments of three - like the 3BP with two primaries and one body at L4/L5 in the collapsed rotating system - and a spacecraft designed to imitate this spacing could ride the gravity monorail at high velocities up to, perhaps beyond, the speed of light . . . after which point the whole pattern repeats.

Presumably there is some radial distance from the center of the Earth at which point the gravity waves begin to coalesce. In the case of the solar system held by the sun's gravity, it may seem somewhat paradoxical that the outer planets are far more massive than the inner planets. Logically, the sun's gravity being stronger closer to it, you'd think there would be much more mass closer to it. This makes since, however, if t he gravity flux becomes more organized the farther you get from the sun, traversing a sort of event horizon at the asteroids.

It helps to quantify this idea, and I have created a value that reflects the total rotational (about the axis of rotation) and kinetic (moving around the sun) energy of the planets. It increases rapidly at a uniform rate, symptomatic of the envelope curve for the motion versus the system wave. ( 3 )

In the context of gravity, consider again the model of a massive body using concentric spheres of uniform density and thickness. At some point in the distance, t he body acts as a point mass. Yet, within any given sphere(s) all the forces cancel, so the exact center of a sphere constructed in this matter is an "all forces nullification point: - i.e. there is no gravity at all.

This implies a measured transition, which in turn suggests - when waves are associated with the system, as a Fourier Series of discrete energy levels - that all the waves are harmonics of a single fundamental frequency (e.g. the "system wave" ( 4 ) suggested this idea), and that there are specific radial distances at which they combine.

Thus, a shuttle aligned to a gravity wave at Earth surface might, as it goes upward, be accelerated at several different rates, as its gravity "rail" becomes stronger and more defined. Similarly, travel in the spherical plane perpendicular to the shuttle's path, at the transition state where new waves coalesce into the whole, it might be possible to travel at a very efficient rate - e.g. a "jet stream" type of phenomena. A similar phenomena might exist in the oceans, a type of inversion layer near the surface.

________________________________
your banner could be here

© 2004 WH Clark